The Hebraic Mindset & the Proper Understanding of the Gospels

 

The Hebraic Mindset & the Proper Understanding of the Gospels

***

Below are excerpts from:

Alan Hirsch, ‎The Forgotten Ways: Reactivating Apostolic Movements, Brazos Press; 2nd edition, Sep. 20, 2016

These excerpts discuss the crucial matter of the difference in believing something (propositional belief) versus believing in somebody as one’s Lord (trusting and obeying) by showing that attempting to understand the Scriptures using the common Western viewpoint distorts a message that ought to be understood using a Hebraic mindset.

***

From Pages 130-131

Essentially, on the one hand, a Hellenistic view of knowledge is concerned with concepts, ideas, the nature of being, types and forms the Hebraic view, on the other hand, is primarily concerned with issues of concrete existence, obedience, life-oriented wisdom, and the interrelationship of all things under God. It is quite clear that, as Jews, Jesus and the early church operated primarily out of a Hebraic understanding rather than a Hellenistic one. . . .

The assumption in Hellenistic thinking is that if people get the right ideas, they will simply change their behavior. the Hellenistic approach, therefore, can be characterized as an attempt to try to think our way into a new way of acting. Both experience and history show the fallacy of such thinking. And it certainly does not make disciples. All we do with this approach is change the way a person thinks; his or her behaviors remain largely unaffected. This can be a very frustrating exercise for that person to deal with the situation from which he or she came.

The diagram “Action-Learning (Discipleship) vs. the Academy” illustrates the distinction. If our starting point is old thinking and old behavior in a person or church, and our task is to change that situation, taking the Hellenistic approach will mean that we will provide information through books and classrooms to try to bring the person/church toa new way of thinking and, hopefully, from there to a new way of acting. The problem is that by merely addressing intellectual aspects of the person, we fail to change behavior.

The assumption in Hellenic thinking is that if people get the right ideas, they will simply change their behavior. The Hellenistic approach, therefore, can be characterized as an attempt to try to think our way into a new way of acting. Both experience and history show the fallacy of such thinking. And it certainly does not make disciples. All we do with this approach is change the way a person thinks; his or her behaviors remain largely unaffected. This can be a very frustrating exercise because once a person is in any new paradigm of thinking, it is very hard for that person is in any new paradigm of thinking, it is very hard for that person to deal with the situation from which he or she came.

Many church leaders experience this situation on a regular basis: it starts with recognition of some sort of problem in the local church together with a desire to address it. Laboring as they are under a system influenced by Hellenistic views of knowledge, they go to a conference or a seminary to access a lot of new ideas about church renewal, leadership and mission. The problem is that all they get is new thinking. They still have to deal with an unchanged. It is genuinely hard to change one’s behaviors by merely getting new ideas, as behaviors are deeply entrenched in us via our ingrained habits, upbringing cultural norms, erroneous thinking, and such. Even though gaining knowledge is essential to transformation, we soon discover that it’s going to take a whole lot more than new thinking to transform us. Anyone who has struggled with an addiction knows this.

I have belabored this point because this type of approach is so deeply entrenched in the Western forms of Christianity that we need to see it for what it is before we can find a better way. What is that better way? You will not be surprised to find out that it is found in the ancient art of disciple making. Disciple making operates best with the Hebrew understanding of knowledge in mind. In other words, we need to take a whole person into account in seeking to transform that person. We also need to understand that we must educate these whole people in the context of life and for life. The way we do this, indeed the way Jesus did it, is to act our way into a new way of thinking. This is clearly how Jesus formed his disciples. They not only lived with him and observed him in every possible circumstance but also ministered with him, all in the context of everyday life. And once again, these practices are found in all phenomenal movements of God.

***

***

***

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Compassion Renaissance: Science, Mind & Spirit

Image
The Compassion Renaissance: Science, Mind & Spirit Richard K. Stephens December 17, 2021 (11,000 words / 36.7 minutes) ***   1) The Compassion Renaissance Compassion is our subject – specifically the art of cultivating compassion as an enduring trait that is rooted in neuroscientific research on the brains of mental discipline practitioners who have achieved a high capacity for the compassion trait. In the past 15 years, or so, of a new field of study called Contemplative Science, America has seen a proliferation of secularized compassion cultivation trainings, based on neuroscientific findings of research of traditional Buddhist meditation practices, come forth and gain widespread attention and an increasing adoption. We are in the midst of a rapidly developing Compassion Renaissance. Concurrent with the development of formal neuro-science-informed secular compassion trainings, a Christian practice making use of the same scientific findings but based specifical...
Read more

Jesus’s Compassion Command : Excerpts from Timothy Keller

Image
Jesus’s Compassion Command, Excerpts from Timothy Keller This post is presented in three sections. First is Keller’s 2003 sermon on the Parable of the Good Samaritan. Second is a collection of excerpts from the most recent edition Keller’s 1989 book, Ministries of Mercy: The Call of the Jericho Road . And finally there is a quotation germane to the subject of former texts taken from another source. *** 1) Timothy J. Keller, “Neighbors,” February 23, 2003 ; transcript (edited for publication): 7133 words We’re looking at the life of Jesus as we find it in the gospel of Luke. We’ve already said that the first nine chapters of Luke are really all about: Who is Jesus? But the next nine chapters, from chapter 9 to about chapter 18, are about: What does it mean to follow Jesus? Chapter 10 begins to answer that question: What does it mean to be a disciple of Jesus? The first part of chapter 10 says that all disciples are messengers. We looked at this last week – being mes...
Read more

Christian Renewal & Visual Art: From Kitsch to Quality

Image
  James Davison Hunter, To Change the World: The Irony, Tragedy, and Possibility of Christianity in the Late Modern World , Oxford UP, 2010. 87 – Noncommercialized art by Christians is, as I said, vital, and growing through organizations such as Image , Christians In the Visual Arts (or CIVA) [which ended operations in 2022], and the international arts movement (IAM), but such efforts are small and constantly underfunded and, like the commercial art (e.g., Thomas Kinkade), it is typically peripheral to the major galleries and reviews. What is more, this vast commercial empire [of Evangelical cultural production] does not operate in the major centers of culture formation (such as New York City, Washington, Chicago, San Francisco, or Los Angeles) but rather in medium-sized cities on the periphery (such as Wheaton, Illinois; Colorado Springs, Colorado; Orlando, Florida; and Virginia Beach, Virginia). Third, cultural production in the Evangelical world is overwhelmingly oriented ...
Read more